Could Harry Dunn crash driver agree to a virtual trial? »

The American driver accused of killing motorcyclist Harry Dunn is keen to focus on participating in a virtual trial in a UK court docket, it was claimed yesterday.

The Director of Public Prosecutions informed 19-year-old Harry’s dad and mom on Wednesday he was ‘actively considering’ a virtual trial for Anne Sacoolas, 43, in an ‘unprecedented legal scenario’. 

Yesterday, sources shut to the mother-of-three mentioned she wished to communicate to British authorities to discover a path ahead. But it’s understood she has not but been formally approached.

The household of Harry Dunn (pictured) have been informed that his alleged killer is keen to focus on participating in a virtual trial in a UK court docket

Anne Sacoolas (pictured) claimed diplomatic immunity following the collision in August 2019 that took the lifetime of the 19-year-old

Harry’s bike was hit by a automotive on the flawed facet of the street outdoors RAF Croughton – a US intelligence base – in Northamptonshire final 12 months.

Mrs Sacoolas, who’s married to a US intelligence officer, fled the UK controversially claiming diplomatic immunity. 

She was charged with inflicting dying by harmful driving in her absence final December.

But Mr Max Hill QC, Director of Public Prosecutions, informed Mr Dunn’s dad and mom Tim Dunn, 50, and Charlotte Charles, 45, that he believed Mrs Sacoolas didn’t have diplomatic immunity when she left the UK.

Mrs Sacoolas claimed she was immune from prosecution after her Volvo SUV collided head-on with 19-year-old Harry’s bike in August 2019.

The DPP’s evaluation of the place places him at odds with the stance taken by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, who informed the Commons final October that Mrs Sacoolas did have immunity.

 File picture dated yesterday exhibits the household of Harry Dunn, mom Charlotte Charles (left) and father Tim Dunn (proper) with their companions, arriving on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London, the place they met with Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab

In December, three months after she flew residence to Virginia together with her household, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) charged Mrs Sacoolas with inflicting {the teenager}’s dying by harmful driving over the crash outdoors RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.

In response to the cost, Mrs Sacoolas’s US lawyer, Amy Jeffress, mentioned her shopper wouldn’t ‘return voluntarily’ to the UK over what was described as a ‘terrible but unintentional accident’.

In January this 12 months an extradition request submitted by the Home Office was rejected by the US State Department.

Last month the Dunn household had been knowledgeable that Attorney General Suella Braverman QC was inspecting the potential of a virtual trial or a trial within the absence of Mrs Sacoolas.

A letter despatched by the CPS to the Dunns’ MP, Andrea Leadsom, this week described holding a virtual trial as ‘an unprecedented legal scenario’.

It added: ‘Before such a step could be even contemplated, a host of factors (both legal and diplomatic) would have to be considered.’

It is known that Mrs Sacoolas has not but been formally approached concerning the matter.

Following Wednesday’s assembly with Mr Hill, the Dunn household’s spokesman, Radd Seiger, mentioned the household had been informed that the US Government would solely agree to a virtual trial if it was below US legislation – one thing he surmised could be a ‘show trial’.

Mr Seiger mentioned the Dunn household would solely settle for a virtual trial if the suspect was tried below UK legislation.

He added: ‘Yesterday, Max Hill QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions, shockingly told us that the US administration’s place stays that there are not any circumstances through which Mrs Sacoolas would submit herself to the English authorized jurisdiction.

‘It now appears, if what is being said is true, that Mrs Sacoolas herself holds a different position.

‘I would therefore urge the Attorney General to bypass the US administration and go straight to Mrs Sacoolas’s attorneys to make this risk a actuality.

‘There can be no further delay for the sake of these parents – they are suffering intolerable pain.’

Source link

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment